Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Explained.
Values are the guiding principles people use to evaluate actions, justify choices, and decide what is worth pursuing. Unlike traits (how you tend to behave) or interests (what activities energize you), values are about what you consider important - and they quietly shape decisions far more than most people notice.
The Schwartz theory of basic values
The Schwartz theory is the most widely validated model of human values in psychology. It identifies ten basic values - Self-Direction, Stimulation, Hedonism, Achievement, Power, Security, Conformity, Tradition, Benevolence, and Universalism - defined by the goal each one expresses. The values form a circle: neighbors are compatible motivations, opposites conflict. Your value profile is the relative priority you give each one, not a yes/no on any single value.
Shalom Schwartz built the model that organizes them. Tested in over 80 countries, it shows that the same ten basic values appear across cultures and, crucially, that they relate to each other in a predictable structure. This page explains the ten values, the circle that connects them, and why the structure - not any single score - is the useful part.
The ten basic values
Each value is defined by its motivational goal. Almost everyone holds all ten to some degree; what differs between people is priority - which ones win when they conflict.
- Self-Direction: independent thought and action - choosing, creating, exploring
- Stimulation: excitement, novelty, and challenge
- Hedonism: pleasure and sensuous gratification
- Achievement: personal success through demonstrating competence
- Power: social status, prestige, and control over people and resources
- Security: safety, harmony, and stability of self, relationships, and society
- Conformity: restraint of actions likely to upset others or violate norms
- Tradition: respect and commitment to the customs and ideas of one’s culture or faith
- Benevolence: preserving and enhancing the welfare of people close to you
- Universalism: understanding, tolerance, and protection of all people and nature
The circle: why values trade off
The defining insight of the theory is that values are not an unordered list - they sit in a circle. Values next to each other share a motivational basis and are easy to pursue together (Power and Achievement both center on self-advancement; Benevolence and Universalism both center on caring beyond yourself). Values on opposite sides of the circle express conflicting goals and are hard to hold strongly at the same time.
The two big oppositions are: Openness to Change (Self-Direction, Stimulation) versus Conservation (Security, Conformity, Tradition); and Self-Enhancement (Power, Achievement) versus Self-Transcendence (Benevolence, Universalism). This is why someone who prizes adventure and independence often feels friction with strong tradition and security, and why a strong drive for status sits uneasily with strong concern for everyone’s welfare. The conflicts are structural, not personal failings.
Reading a value profile honestly
Because everyone rates most values as at least somewhat important, the signal is in the pattern - which values rank highest relative to the others - not the raw height of any single one. So you read a values result as a profile rather than a verdict on any one value: each value is placed against population norms (a percentile per value) so you can see both where you stand on it and how it ranks against your other priorities. The shape of the profile, like a fingerprint of priorities, is what carries the meaning.
And no profile is better than another. The theory is descriptive: it maps what you prioritize, not what you should. Its usefulness is self-understanding and the early warning it gives about where your own values will pull against each other - in a career decision, a relationship, or a moral dilemma.
Values versus traits and interests
Values, personality traits, and interests are three different layers. Traits (the Big Five) describe your characteristic patterns of behavior; interests (RIASEC) describe the activities that energize you; values describe the goals you consider worth pursuing. They overlap modestly but each adds information the others miss - which is why a full self-portrait uses more than one lens.
Also relevant: Values vs personality: the difference
Frequently asked questions
What are the 10 Schwartz values?
Self-Direction, Stimulation, Hedonism, Achievement, Power, Security, Conformity, Tradition, Benevolence, and Universalism. Each is defined by the motivational goal it expresses, and they are arranged in a circle of compatible and conflicting motivations.
Are Schwartz values universal across cultures?
The ten basic values and their circular structure have been recovered in samples from more than 80 countries, which is the theory’s strongest empirical claim. What varies across cultures is the average priority given to each value, not which values exist or how they relate.
Can my values change over time?
Value priorities are fairly stable in adulthood but not fixed. They shift gradually with age (security and tradition tend to rise, stimulation tends to fall), and can move after major life transitions. A re-check after a significant change of circumstances is informative.
How are values different from personality?
Personality traits describe how you tend to behave; values describe what you consider important and worth pursuing. The two correlate modestly - for example openness to experience aligns with valuing self-direction - but values predict choices and moral judgments that traits alone do not.
References
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
- Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
- Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517-546.
Built and led by a PhD psychometrician who designed international assessment frameworks for the OECD. About the team · How our tests are built and validated